Wikipedija:Botovi/Zahtjevi za status/MGA73bot
zahtjev • doprinosi • brojač • otvoreni računi • evidencije • evidencija premještanja • evidencija blokiranja • evidencija bot-prava • dodijeli status
- Vlasnik: MGA73 (glavna Wiki • razgovor)
- Način rada: Manually Assisted
- Programski jezik:Pywikipedia
- Djelatnost: Complete en:Wikipedia:Image license migration by fixing the files in Kategorija:Wikipedia license migration candidates (763 files) per Wikipedija:Kafić/Pitanja_o_slikama#Nema_licence_+_migracija_licence.
- Vrijeme uređivanja: one time run
- Izmjene u intervalu od: Circa 5 seconds between edits
- Bot status na:A number of wikis per Special:CentralAuth/MGA73bot. Some flags were moved because task was completed. The name it use on Commons is MGA73bot2.
Dodatak:I have not made any edits yet. Text on Wikipedija:Botovi/Zahtjevi za status say only interwiki bots can make test edits? So will wait a few days before I make any test edits to either get an okay or at least other users a chance to comment first.
—MGA73 (razgovor) 23:15, 26. listopada 2024. (CEST)
- @MGA73 Apologies for the delay, I wasn't really active for the past few months and I didn't see your request in time. I see that your bot already has a bot flag on several wiki-projects, so, as far as I'm concerned, you're free to make several test edits before you're granted a bot flag on this project as well. Neptune 🕉 the Mystic 12:34, 8. prosinca 2024. (CET)
- Thank you Suradnik:Neptune, the Mystic. Suradnik:Ponor suggested on Razgovor_sa_suradnikom:Ponor#GFDL_license_migration that many of the remaining files in Kategorija:Wikipedia license migration candidates may not own work and so the GFDL may also not be correct. There are ~275 files left so the question is if we should just ignore that and mark the files as eligible or not-eligible depending on the time of upload or if the files should all be checked manually and deleted if there is no good source/author. If anyone would like to check the files we can see how many/few are left. But if there are noone that would like to check the files we might as well complete the license migration now. A third option is that someone scan the category and check the most unlikely own work files and then we fix the rest. Let me know what you both think before I start fixing files (and remove them from the category). —MGA73 (razgovor) 13:06, 8. prosinca 2024. (CET)
- @MGA73 Leave everything as it is, we cannot trust those license templates. It helps to have the files in their current category. ponor (razgovor) 14:16, 9. prosinca 2024. (CET)
- Okay! The 14 files on Suradnik:MGA73/Sandbox should be unused. An easy solution is just to delete those to bring the number of files down a bit. —MGA73 (razgovor) 18:00, 9. prosinca 2024. (CET)
- @MGA73 Leave everything as it is, we cannot trust those license templates. It helps to have the files in their current category. ponor (razgovor) 14:16, 9. prosinca 2024. (CET)
- Thank you Suradnik:Neptune, the Mystic. Suradnik:Ponor suggested on Razgovor_sa_suradnikom:Ponor#GFDL_license_migration that many of the remaining files in Kategorija:Wikipedia license migration candidates may not own work and so the GFDL may also not be correct. There are ~275 files left so the question is if we should just ignore that and mark the files as eligible or not-eligible depending on the time of upload or if the files should all be checked manually and deleted if there is no good source/author. If anyone would like to check the files we can see how many/few are left. But if there are noone that would like to check the files we might as well complete the license migration now. A third option is that someone scan the category and check the most unlikely own work files and then we fix the rest. Let me know what you both think before I start fixing files (and remove them from the category). —MGA73 (razgovor) 13:06, 8. prosinca 2024. (CET)
ZA LGTM. --Novak Watchmen (razgovor) 11:38, 9. prosinca 2024. (CET)
